House Dems Confront Trump Aide Lewandowski Over Lying On MSNBC | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC

House Dems Confront Trump Aide Lewandowski Over Lying On MSNBC | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC


>>>WE ARE BACK WITH THIS>>>WE ARE BACK WITH THIS ONGOING OBSTRUCTION HEARING THAT ONGOING OBSTRUCTION HEARING THAT DEVOLVED AT TIMES INTO TOTAL DEVOLVED AT TIMES INTO TOTAL CHAOS. CHAOS. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS CLASHING MEMBERS OF CONGRESS CLASHING WITH COREY LEWANDOWSKI WHO WAS WITH COREY LEWANDOWSKI WHO WAS UNDER OATH, THIS IS A VERY BIG UNDER OATH, THIS IS A VERY BIG DEAL, DEALING WITH QUESTIONS DEAL, DEALING WITH QUESTIONS OVER DONALD TRUMP’S ALLEGED OVER DONALD TRUMP’S ALLEGED CRIMES IN OFFICE, ALEAST CRIMES IN OFFICE, ALEAST ACCORDING TO DEMOCRATS’ ACCORDING TO DEMOCRATS’ INTERPRETATION OF THE MUELLER INTERPRETATION OF THE MUELLER REPORT REPORT DAVID CICILLINE HAD THIS FLASH DAVID CICILLINE HAD THIS FLASH POINT. POINT. HE ASKED CHAIRMAN NADLER TO HOLD HE ASKED CHAIRMAN NADLER TO HOLD LEWANDOWSKI IN CONTEMPT. LEWANDOWSKI IN CONTEMPT. TAKE A LOOK. TAKE A LOOK.>>DID YOU TELL THE PRESIDENT>>DID YOU TELL THE PRESIDENT YOU WERE GOING TO DELIVER THE YOU WERE GOING TO DELIVER THE MESSAGE? MESSAGE?>>I CAN’T COMMENT ON PRIVATE>>I CAN’T COMMENT ON PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS. CONVERSATIONS.>>OKAY, SIR, IT’S ON PAGE –>>OKAY, SIR, IT’S ON PAGE –>>I CAN READ YOU THE EXACT>>I CAN READ YOU THE EXACT STATEMENT. STATEMENT. THE WHITE HOUSE HAS DIRECTED I THE WHITE HOUSE HAS DIRECTED I NOT DISCLOSE THE SUBSTANCE OF NOT DISCLOSE THE SUBSTANCE OF ANY CONVERSATIONS WITH THE ANY CONVERSATIONS WITH THE PRESIDENT TO PROTECT PRESIDENT TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY. CONFIDENTIALITY.>>NOT TO STONEWALL ME IN MY>>NOT TO STONEWALL ME IN MY QUESTION QUESTION MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS WITNESS MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS WITNESS CONTINUES TO OBSTRUCT THE WORK CONTINUES TO OBSTRUCT THE WORK OF THIS COMMITTEE. OF THIS COMMITTEE. HE’S BEEN ORDERED TO ANSWER AND HE’S BEEN ORDERED TO ANSWER AND I ASK THAT YOU JUDGE HIM IN I ASK THAT YOU JUDGE HIM IN CONTEMPT IN THESE PROCEEDINGS. CONTEMPT IN THESE PROCEEDINGS.>>I’M JOINED BY FORMER FEDERAL>>I’M JOINED BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR JOYCE VANCE PROSECUTOR JOYCE VANCE SHE ALSO TESTIFIED BEFORE THE SHE ALSO TESTIFIED BEFORE THE SAME JUDICIARY COMMITTEE THIS SAME JUDICIARY COMMITTEE THIS SUMMER ON A HEARING CALLED SUMMER ON A HEARING CALLED LESSONS FROM THE MUELLER REPORT LESSONS FROM THE MUELLER REPORT AND PRESIDENTIAL OBSTRUCTION AND PRESIDENTIAL OBSTRUCTION YOU WERE DEEMED A FITTING YOU WERE DEEMED A FITTING WITNESS BY THE GOVERNMENT. WITNESS BY THE GOVERNMENT. WE SEE YOU AS A FITTING EXPERT WE SEE YOU AS A FITTING EXPERT THANKS FOR BEING HERE ON THIS THANKS FOR BEING HERE ON THIS BIG NIGHT, JOYCE BIG NIGHT, JOYCE>>THANKS, ARI.>>THANKS, ARI.>>GLAD TO HAVE YOU.>>GLAD TO HAVE YOU. I HAVE A LOT OF NEW STUFF TO GET I HAVE A LOT OF NEW STUFF TO GET TO, INCLUDING SOMETHING THAT TO, INCLUDING SOMETHING THAT JUST HAPPENED IN THE HEARING JUST HAPPENED IN THE HEARING BUT FIRST RIGHT NOW, YOUR VIEW BUT FIRST RIGHT NOW, YOUR VIEW OF THAT PIECE OF IT. OF THAT PIECE OF IT. WE WENT THROUGH IN OUR FIRST WE WENT THROUGH IN OUR FIRST COVERAGE AT THE TOP OF THE SHOW COVERAGE AT THE TOP OF THE SHOW ABOUT WHAT WE LEARNED AND DIDN’T ABOUT WHAT WE LEARNED AND DIDN’T FROM LEWANDOWSKI FROM LEWANDOWSKI THIS ARGUMENT FROM SOME ON THE THIS ARGUMENT FROM SOME ON THE COMMITTEE THAT HE PASSED THE COMMITTEE THAT HE PASSED THE LINE AT WHICH IT WOULD BE VALID LINE AT WHICH IT WOULD BE VALID TO HOLD HIM IN CONTEMPT. TO HOLD HIM IN CONTEMPT. YOUR VIEW. YOUR VIEW.>>YOU KNOW, HE IS — I HAVE TO>>YOU KNOW, HE IS — I HAVE TO SAY THIS IS A LEGAL TERM OF SAY THIS IS A LEGAL TERM OF ART — ONE OF THE SMARMIEST ART — ONE OF THE SMARMIEST WITNESSES I HAVE EVER SEEN ON WITNESSES I HAVE EVER SEEN ON THE STAND. THE STAND. IF THIS WAS A TRIAL SETTING WITH IF THIS WAS A TRIAL SETTING WITH A JURY, THE JURY — HE WOULD NOT A JURY, THE JURY — HE WOULD NOT BE THEIR FAVORITE WITNESS AT BE THEIR FAVORITE WITNESS AT THIS POINT THIS POINT HE’S DOING VERY LITTLE, I THINK, HE’S DOING VERY LITTLE, I THINK, TO TRY TO PARTICIPATE IN GOOD TO TRY TO PARTICIPATE IN GOOD FAITH IN THE PROCEEDINGS FAITH IN THE PROCEEDINGS WHETHER IT’S CONTEMPT IS A VERY WHETHER IT’S CONTEMPT IS A VERY CLOSE CALL JUDGMENT THAT HAS TO CLOSE CALL JUDGMENT THAT HAS TO DO WITH LITIGATING THIS ISSUE OF DO WITH LITIGATING THIS ISSUE OF THE PROPER SCOPE OF EXECUTIVE THE PROPER SCOPE OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE. PRIVILEGE. I THINK THE PRESIDENT HAS I THINK THE PRESIDENT HAS STRETCHED THIS BEYOND ANY STRETCHED THIS BEYOND ANY POSSIBLE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT POSSIBLE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IT’S REALLY MEANT TO COVER IT’S REALLY MEANT TO COVER IT’S NOT, AS RON KLAIN SAID IT’S NOT, AS RON KLAIN SAID EARLIER TODAY, MEANT TO BE A EARLIER TODAY, MEANT TO BE A PRESIDENT BAGMAN PRIVILEGE PRESIDENT BAGMAN PRIVILEGE IT’S REALLY MEANT TO COVER IT’S REALLY MEANT TO COVER LEGITIMATE EXECUTIVE BRANCH LEGITIMATE EXECUTIVE BRANCH DECISION-MAKING. DECISION-MAKING. THE PRESIDENT IS ABUSING IT AND THE PRESIDENT IS ABUSING IT AND I THINK IT’S TIME TO CALL HIS I THINK IT’S TIME TO CALL HIS BLUFF. BLUFF.>>REALLY STRIKING TO HEAR YOUR>>REALLY STRIKING TO HEAR YOUR VIEW ON THAT, THE HEARING NOT VIEW ON THAT, THE HEARING NOT EVEN OVER AND IT IS OBVIOUSLY EVEN OVER AND IT IS OBVIOUSLY UNUSUAL TO HAVE PEOPLE SAY IN A UNUSUAL TO HAVE PEOPLE SAY IN A SERIOUS WAY NOT JUST SORT OF SERIOUS WAY NOT JUST SORT OF SHOOTING OFF, BUT PEOPLE ON THE SHOOTING OFF, BUT PEOPLE ON THE COMMITTEE AND WE’RE HEARING FROM COMMITTEE AND WE’RE HEARING FROM EXPERTS SAYING MAYBE WHAT YOU DO EXPERTS SAYING MAYBE WHAT YOU DO WITH SOMEONE WHO CONDUCTS WITH SOMEONE WHO CONDUCTS HIMSELF THIS WAY IS ULTIMATELY HIMSELF THIS WAY IS ULTIMATELY HOLD HIM IN CONTEMPT FOR THAT. HOLD HIM IN CONTEMPT FOR THAT. I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT SOMETHING THAT I REFERENCED SOMETHING THAT I REFERENCED EARLIER, WHICH GOES TO THE EARLIER, WHICH GOES TO THE FACT-FINDING BUT ALSO TO THE FACT-FINDING BUT ALSO TO THE POTENTIAL DELIBERATE NATURE OF POTENTIAL DELIBERATE NATURE OF HOW PEOPLE COVERED UP OR MISLED HOW PEOPLE COVERED UP OR MISLED ALLEGEDLY IN THIS MATTER ALLEGEDLY IN THIS MATTER BECAUSE WE INTERVIEWED COREY BECAUSE WE INTERVIEWED COREY LEWANDOWSKI AND WE CAREFULLY LEWANDOWSKI AND WE CAREFULLY PREPARED AND ASKED HIM QUESTIONS PREPARED AND ASKED HIM QUESTIONS ABOUT WHETHER HE RECEIVED ANY OF ABOUT WHETHER HE RECEIVED ANY OF THESE REQUESTS OR PRESSURE TO THESE REQUESTS OR PRESSURE TO INTERFERE. INTERFERE. THAT WAS A BIG PART OF THE THAT WAS A BIG PART OF THE OBSTRUCTION PIECE. OBSTRUCTION PIECE. FIRST FOR CONTEXT, THIS WAS WHAT FIRST FOR CONTEXT, THIS WAS WHAT HE SAID IN THAT INTERVIEW ON HE SAID IN THAT INTERVIEW ON “THE BEAT. “THE BEAT.>>DO YOU THINK IT’S PROBLEMATIC>>DO YOU THINK IT’S PROBLEMATIC THAT “THE NEW YORK TIMES” HAS THAT “THE NEW YORK TIMES” HAS SOURCES THERE FOR THE STORY SOURCES THERE FOR THE STORY REPORTING THAT DONALD TRUMP REPORTING THAT DONALD TRUMP CALLED YOU AND ASKED YOU TO HELP CALLED YOU AND ASKED YOU TO HELP OUST JEFF SESSIONS IN THE MIDDLE OUST JEFF SESSIONS IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS PROBE? OF THIS PROBE?>>WELL, I THINK THIS.>>WELL, I THINK THIS. I THINK THAT WE HAVE SEEN TIME I THINK THAT WE HAVE SEEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND TIME AGAIN MAINSTREAM MEDIA OUTLETS GETTING STORIES WRONG. OUTLETS GETTING STORIES WRONG. I DON’T EVER REMEMBER THE I DON’T EVER REMEMBER THE PRESIDENT EVER ASKING ME TO GET PRESIDENT EVER ASKING ME TO GET INVOLVED WITH JEFF SESSIONS OR INVOLVED WITH JEFF SESSIONS OR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN ANY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM EVER. WAY, SHAPE OR FORM EVER.>>ANY SHAPE, WAY OR FORM, COREY>>ANY SHAPE, WAY OR FORM, COREY LEWANDOWSKI. LEWANDOWSKI. WE KNOW THAT STATEMENT MADE WE KNOW THAT STATEMENT MADE ORIGINALLY HERE ON MSNBC WAS A ORIGINALLY HERE ON MSNBC WAS A LIE. LIE. ACCORDING TO COREY LEWANDOWSKI, ACCORDING TO COREY LEWANDOWSKI, BECAUSE IN HIS INTERVIEW WITH BECAUSE IN HIS INTERVIEW WITH MUELLER HE SAID SO AND RECOUNTED MUELLER HE SAID SO AND RECOUNTED THESE INTERACTIONS REGARDING THESE INTERACTIONS REGARDING SESSIONS SESSIONS AS WE WERE COMING ON THE AIR I AS WE WERE COMING ON THE AIR I WAS TOLD THIS VERY ISSUE CAME UP WAS TOLD THIS VERY ISSUE CAME UP IN THE HEARING AND WE HAVE A IN THE HEARING AND WE HAVE A SHORT EXCERPT FROM THAT WHERE HE SHORT EXCERPT FROM THAT WHERE HE WAS ACTUALLY ASKED ABOUT THAT WAS ACTUALLY ASKED ABOUT THAT LIE ON MSNBC’S “THE BEAT.” LIE ON MSNBC’S “THE BEAT.” TAKE A LOOK. TAKE A LOOK.>>THAT WAS NOT TRUE, WAS IT>>THAT WAS NOT TRUE, WAS IT>>I HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO BE>>I HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO BE HONEST WITH THE MEDIA BECAUSE HONEST WITH THE MEDIA BECAUSE THEY’RE JUST AS DISHONEST AS THEY’RE JUST AS DISHONEST AS ANYBODY ELSE ANYBODY ELSE>>YOUR RESPONSE>>YOUR RESPONSE>>YOU KNOW, THIS IS INCREDIBLE.>>YOU KNOW, THIS IS INCREDIBLE. WE’VE SHIFTED OVER NOW FROM THE WE’VE SHIFTED OVER NOW FROM THE MEMBERS QUESTIONING LEWANDOWSKI MEMBERS QUESTIONING LEWANDOWSKI TO THE COMMITTEE STAFF TO THE COMMITTEE STAFF THAT WAS BARRY BURKE, AN THAT WAS BARRY BURKE, AN EXPERIENCED CRIMINAL DEFENSE EXPERIENCED CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER LAWYER AN IN THE FIRST FEW MINUTES OF AN IN THE FIRST FEW MINUTES OF HIS QUESTIONING, IT BECAME CLEAR HIS QUESTIONING, IT BECAME CLEAR THAT THIS WAS AN ENTIRELY NEW THAT THIS WAS AN ENTIRELY NEW HEARING. HEARING. LUNEWANDOWSKI WAS FORCED TO ADMI LUNEWANDOWSKI WAS FORCED TO ADMI THAT HE HAD BEEN UNTRUTHFUL THAT HE HAD BEEN UNTRUTHFUL EARLIER IN THE DAY WHEN HE SAID EARLIER IN THE DAY WHEN HE SAID HE HAD ALWAYS TESTIFIED HE HAD ALWAYS TESTIFIED VOLUNTARILY. VOLUNTARILY. BURKE SEEMINGLY MADE THE POINT BURKE SEEMINGLY MADE THE POINT THAT HE ONLY TESTIFIED THAT HE ONLY TESTIFIED TRUTHFULLY TO MUELLER AFTER HE TRUTHFULLY TO MUELLER AFTER HE WAS GIVEN IMMUNITY AND THAT WAS GIVEN IMMUNITY AND THAT STATEMENT HE MADE ON YOUR SHOW STATEMENT HE MADE ON YOUR SHOW WAS BEFORE HE RECEIVED IMMUNITY WAS BEFORE HE RECEIVED IMMUNITY WHILE HE WAS STILL TRYING TO WHILE HE WAS STILL TRYING TO PROTECT HIMSELF AND THE PROTECT HIMSELF AND THE PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT. FROM WHAT I COULD SEE OF THAT FROM WHAT I COULD SEE OF THAT QUESTIONING, IT’S ONLY GOING TO QUESTIONING, IT’S ONLY GOING TO GO DOWNHILL FOR LEWANDOWSKI. GO DOWNHILL FOR LEWANDOWSKI.>>YOU MENTIONED THAT WE’RE>>YOU MENTIONED THAT WE’RE LOOKING AT LIVE PICTURES HERE OF LOOKING AT LIVE PICTURES HERE OF MR. BURKE STILL QUESTIONING MR. MR. BURKE STILL QUESTIONING MR. LEWANDOWSKI UNDER OATH AND WE’LL LEWANDOWSKI UNDER OATH AND WE’LL CONTINUE TO BRING FOLKS EXCERPTS CONTINUE TO BRING FOLKS EXCERPTS AND HIGHLIGHTS AS NEWSWORTHY AND HIGHLIGHTS AS NEWSWORTHY PARTS COME OUT PARTS COME OUT THAT’S A FITTING PLACE FOR YOU THAT’S A FITTING PLACE FOR YOU TO CONTINUE YOUR ANALYSIS. TO CONTINUE YOUR ANALYSIS. WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST TIME THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST TIME WE’VE SEEN THESE NEW RULES WE’VE SEEN THESE NEW RULES APPLIED FOR THE OBSTRUCTION APPLIED FOR THE OBSTRUCTION PROBE. PROBE. 6:30 P.M., SOME PEOPLE MAY GO 6:30 P.M., SOME PEOPLE MAY GO HOME ON THE EAST COAST FROM WORK HOME ON THE EAST COAST FROM WORK BY THEN. BY THEN. THIS HEARING GOING STRONG. THIS HEARING GOING STRONG. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HAVE THAT WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HAVE THAT COMMITTEE COUNSEL INVOLVED COMMITTEE COUNSEL INVOLVED>>I THINK WHAT WE’RE HEARING>>I THINK WHAT WE’RE HEARING NOW WITH COMMITTEE COUNSEL IS NOW WITH COMMITTEE COUNSEL IS SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WE HEAR WITH THE FROM WHAT WE HEAR WITH THE MEMBERS. MEMBERS. I MEAN THEM NO DISRESPECT. I MEAN THEM NO DISRESPECT. BURKE IS A TRAINED LAWYER, HE’S BURKE IS A TRAINED LAWYER, HE’S USED TO CUTTING THROUGH THE USED TO CUTTING THROUGH THE SMARMINESS AND FAILURE TO ANSWER SMARMINESS AND FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. LEWANDOWSKI TOOK A MOMENT WHERE LEWANDOWSKI TOOK A MOMENT WHERE HE TRIED TO PLUG HIS OWN BOOK, HE TRIED TO PLUG HIS OWN BOOK, SORT OF MAKING A JOKE OF ONE OF SORT OF MAKING A JOKE OF ONE OF BURKE’S QUESTIONS, AND BURKE WAS BURKE’S QUESTIONS, AND BURKE WAS ALL BUSINESS, CONTINUING TO ALL BUSINESS, CONTINUING TO GRILL HIM ON WHETHER OR NOT HE GRILL HIM ON WHETHER OR NOT HE HAD MADE A SERIES OF FALSE HAD MADE A SERIES OF FALSE STATEMENTS REGARDING WHAT IN STATEMENTS REGARDING WHAT IN ESSENCE WAS THE PRESIDENT’S ESSENCE WAS THE PRESIDENT’S EFFORT TO OBSTRUCTION JUSTICE. EFFORT TO OBSTRUCTION JUSTICE. WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT IS THE WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT IS THE PRESIDENT DIRECTING LEWANDOWSKI, PRESIDENT DIRECTING LEWANDOWSKI, WHO WAS NOT A GOVERNMENT WHO WAS NOT A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, TO GO TO SESSIONS AND EMPLOYEE, TO GO TO SESSIONS AND TELL SESSIONS ESSENTIALLY TO END TELL SESSIONS ESSENTIALLY TO END THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION INTO THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION INTO TRUMP, TO LIMIT IT ONLY TO TRUMP, TO LIMIT IT ONLY TO FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS. FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS. SO NOW BURKE IS UNPACKING THAT SO NOW BURKE IS UNPACKING THAT SYSTEMATICALLY SYSTEMATICALLY IT WILL BE, I THINK, RIVETING IT WILL BE, I THINK, RIVETING TESTIMONY TO WATCH FROM START TO TESTIMONY TO WATCH FROM START TO FINISH FINISH HE GETS 30 MINUTES, UNLIKE THE HE GETS 30 MINUTES, UNLIKE THE MEMBERS WHO ONLY GET FIVE MEMBERS WHO ONLY GET FIVE MINUTES APIECE. MINUTES APIECE.>>YEAH.>>YEAH. WE’LL ABSOLUTELY STAY ON IT AND WE’LL ABSOLUTELY STAY ON IT AND REALLY STRIKING TO SEE UNDER REALLY STRIKING TO SEE UNDER OATH SOMEONE TO ADMIT TO THEIR OATH SOMEONE TO ADMIT TO THEIR LYING AND THEN EXPLAIN THE LYING AND THEN EXPLAIN THE REASON IS THEIR DISRESPECT AS REASON IS THEIR DISRESPECT AS STATED FOR THE PRESS STATED FOR THE PRESS I WOULD ONLY ADD, AND FULL I WOULD ONLY ADD, AND FULL DISCLOSURE, WAS A PARTICIPANT IN DISCLOSURE, WAS A PARTICIPANT IN PART OF THIS, BUT I WOULD ONLY PART OF THIS, BUT I WOULD ONLY ADD WHATEVER ONE’S VIEW OF THE ADD WHATEVER ONE’S VIEW OF THE PRESS OR INTERVIEW,MR. PRESS OR INTERVIEW,MR. LEWANDOWSKI WOULD ALSO SEEM TO LEWANDOWSKI WOULD ALSO SEEM TO WANT TO HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO WANT TO HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO HIS OWN SUPPORTERS, TO THE HIS OWN SUPPORTERS, TO THE PUBLIC, TO THE CITIZENRY OF THIS PUBLIC, TO THE CITIZENRY OF THIS COUNTRY THAT HE COULD TELL THE COUNTRY THAT HE COULD TELL THE TRUTH OR NOT TRUTH OR NOT ONE OF THE THINGS WE’VE LEARNED

Comments

  1. Post
    Author
  2. Post
    Author
    Danny Long

    Lew is the one who was responsible in promoting trump to presidency, so what make Democrats think he be any different now? He had no conscience at the beginning and he proved that he has no conscience now just like his owner. Now Lew go to you owner to get your treats. Bark now.

  3. Post
    Author
  4. Post
    Author
  5. Post
    Author
  6. Post
    Author
    Dave Box

    We're coming up to four years where it has been shown that this President and this administration has colluded with an enemy, enriches itself from the office of President; it lies and covers up and shows no regard for the Constitution or morality. Please, never boast to me that America is home to the free and font of democracy. You are home to freedom for those of you have the money. Source of democracy as long as it's aligned with the will of the US government. You are a sick country who lost any sense of morality decades ago.

  7. Post
    Author
    David Green

    Yeah, and Trump will almost certainly hand out a pardon from being held accountable IF, and only if, he finds the Little twerp lewandowski could possibly sink him!

  8. Post
    Author
  9. Post
    Author
  10. Post
    Author
    kobbs99

    It's time to stand up and make something count for decency sake. The whole world is watching and America please realise that you have the chance prevent the apocalypse that is on the way.
    If there is any rule of law then let the law rule.

  11. Post
    Author
  12. Post
    Author
  13. Post
    Author
    Gordon Phillips

    Dems are coming across as inept and helpless morons in the eyes of the American public. So far not one of these obstructionists Republican miscreants have been held in contempt and locked up. Do your jobs Dems, or lose the trust of the American public.

  14. Post
    Author
    Declan Kearns

    He was trying to be held on contempt. If he did he would have got the proceedings adjourned. This is exactly what he wanted.

    If you watch the proceedings all the way to the end you'll see him crack under party council, Barry Bourke. It's well worth a watch.

  15. Post
    Author
  16. Post
    Author
  17. Post
    Author
    Wado Waleli

    Lewandowski SHOULD be held in contempt of Congress. Any impartial legal expert would agree with that. What we see here is criminal protecting criminal.

  18. Post
    Author
  19. Post
    Author
  20. Post
    Author
  21. Post
    Author
  22. Post
    Author
    Jabathaslut

    If ANYONE wishes to play the game of diminishing the lawful investigation of a Congressional Committee, then the Chair of that Committee show engage with that person as such – request the attendance of the Sargent at Arms and have that witness arrested and detained on the spot. Then let that same witness bear the legal cost to have a court determine if there charge is valid. Give them asome time to sit and consider what they are doing and the possible outcome from their behaviour.

  23. Post
    Author
  24. Post
    Author
  25. Post
    Author
  26. Post
    Author
  27. Post
    Author
  28. Post
    Author
  29. Post
    Author
  30. Post
    Author
    Ted Cyrek

    How is there obstruction when there was no collusion? Think about it. With that being said. The Mueller investigation was never stopped, and that means it’s not obstruction ( you could argue it was attempted obstruction). So this whole thing really is a nothing burger, which is why Mueller didn’t cite Trump with obstruction. If you don’t like Trump then vote him out—but quite whining about this.

  31. Post
    Author
    MrSkeeter18

    Cory’s children will grow up and be able to read that their father has lied to the American people. He should be so proud.

  32. Post
    Author
  33. Post
    Author
  34. Post
    Author
  35. Post
    Author
  36. Post
    Author
  37. Post
    Author
  38. Post
    Author
  39. Post
    Author
    george plimpton

    The media is a bunch of liars because they asked me questions that I lied about and then quoted me! This seems to be a pattern in the Trump crime family.

  40. Post
    Author
  41. Post
    Author
  42. Post
    Author
  43. Post
    Author
  44. Post
    Author
  45. Post
    Author
    TERMINATAH

    F**k this crap. I cant get away with a parking ticket and such people get away with lying under oath. You know what's bad. They all do it even the ones adking the questions.

  46. Post
    Author
    Stev Rex

    You tell me that this lewendoski loser does not have a strikingly punchable face. This is a guy who believes it is fine to punch his wife. So many losers in this administration!

  47. Post
    Author
  48. Post
    Author
  49. Post
    Author
    earlsfield exile

    He's not only a lying piece of crap he's also a stupid piece of crap. He says " I have no obligation to be honest with the media" as if he's had a private conversation with a journalist. He was addressing a question that was being broadcast to the American public and openly admits he feels under no obligation to tell them the truth! Could there be any clearer indication of the contempt Trump and his gang of thieves have for their voters ?

  50. Post
    Author
  51. Post
    Author
  52. Post
    Author
  53. Post
    Author
  54. Post
    Author
  55. Post
    Author
  56. Post
    Author
  57. Post
    Author
    Dribrom Sunrock

    First of all just because some one is lying to you does not make it right to tell lies in return. Any 4 year old child can tell you that. Lying to some one that you think are telling lies are as bad as telling lies during any other circumstances.

  58. Post
    Author
    Slapdat Hugh Jass

    I didn’t think it was possible for Nadler and his bitter House Judiciary Committee to look more like fools… I was wrong.

  59. Post
    Author
    Vedder Girl

    POS Lewdoutski, should be ashamed of his behavior, liar, corrupt, egoist, disrespectful punk, and he is a father?!
    Wow. his poor children,
    I will pray for them.
    No way should he ever be a public servant or work in government.
    He is perfect example of a spineless, greedy, unethical, foul person, if works in any branch of our govt….will disrupt and corrupt every chance he gets.
    Shame on you C.L.
    Find your soul.

  60. Post
    Author
    Darren Anderson

    No collision ,no crime . Simple. So tell how you abstract justice if no crime has been committed. Unless it's leftwing media TDS get some help

  61. Post
    Author
  62. Post
    Author
    Glenys Thomson

    We are all getting shock proff. If Trump had every Democrat arrested it wouldn't surprise me. Tattoo them and make them wear armbands. Been done in my lifetime . Dictators do whatever they please.

  63. Post
    Author
    Claude LeBel

    This is where we see how weak these supposedly powerful men actually are. No better than a child caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Are you a man or a mouse?

  64. Post
    Author
  65. Post
    Author
  66. Post
    Author
  67. Post
    Author
  68. Post
    Author
    d d

    Lewandowski was not cited for contempt although he clearly was.
    Ari's guest suggests here that it is a question of the proper scope of executive priviledge and that Trump has stretched its limits. Ya Think!?

  69. Post
    Author
  70. Post
    Author
    265petsar

    The Little Flie, trying to impress the Big Turd. You only have to look at this guys face to see what a lying creep he is, who idolizers Trump. His family must be so proud of him for throwing away his family name into the gutter, for a Turd who will attack him sometime in the future. Don't you just love the stupidity of Republicans.

  71. Post
    Author
  72. Post
    Author
  73. Post
    Author
  74. Post
    Author
  75. Post
    Author
  76. Post
    Author
  77. Post
    Author
    Ozler Gurpinar

    I cannot imagine but I guess he will be running to be a senator, this guy US senato??, oh my God, just the thought makes me want to throw up

  78. Post
    Author
  79. Post
    Author
    Darrin Myers

    Corey Lewinsky mopt the floor with this hearing again democrats make themselves look like ignorant donkeys what a joke democrats so desperate and disgusting msn cnn rateings are lower than Nickelodeon look it up your self so sad fox news rateings of the charts look it up your self turmp 2020baby

  80. Post
    Author
  81. Post
    Author
    Sarah Shim

    Can we handcuff this lawless Trump's crony and drag out of the room? How long we, citizens, have to tolerate seeing person like this crony contemptuously violating our rules of laws?

  82. Post
    Author
  83. Post
    Author
  84. Post
    Author
  85. Post
    Author
  86. Post
    Author
    Oddvard Myrnes

    Nothing any of these talking heads or teir guests have said has come true. Nothing. If a person tell you lies over and over again will you stop listening to that person?

  87. Post
    Author
    ezenwa okolie

    i still don't understand what goes on in their head when they look people in the eye and lie about things that everyone knows about. Am sorry Americans, but your president and his aids are indirectly calling you guys fools.

  88. Post
    Author
  89. Post
    Author
  90. Post
    Author
    CB Rennard

    I agree with another commenter: these low-life thugs and jerkwads do NOT intend to play by the rules. Wherever and whenever they can obstruct, obfuscate, derail, confuse, delay, etc etc….they will. Why? BECAUSE THEY ARE GUILTY!!!! Stop the pussyfooting around, dems, go for the jugular on this swineherd.

  91. Post
    Author
    amiho gatai

    he still goes on tv to show his ugly face and defend the lies. these people have some nerve. with this type of mafia-like loyalists, the damage this russian wanna be president has visited on the american system of government will take a very long time to undo. perhaps never.

  92. Post
    Author
  93. Post
    Author
  94. Post
    Author
  95. Post
    Author
    John Marshall

    Rational Americans should be very concerned about the 2020 election. If the Dems cannot summarily nail a weasel like Lewandowski for contempt based on yesterday's disgraceful performance they have not got a hope of defeating Dear Leader Trump in the coming election, let alone impeaching him.

  96. Post
    Author
  97. Post
    Author
    Dia Atkin

    I find it hilarious that MSNBC was lied to. MSNBC has been lying since president Trump was elected by Americans. President Trump is doing his job ignoring and laughing at MSM baloney. Levondoski can say anything just like MSM he wants he's not under oath. Hahaha. Keep lying it's hilarious.

  98. Post
    Author
  99. Post
    Author
  100. Post
    Author
    Thomas Tamir

    If there is a divine institution in this country it's MSNBC. Okay Corey for your penance say Barrack Obama 10 times, and Hilary Clinton 10 times.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *